Difference between revisions of "Good Reporting"

From G8
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Any course of journalism would probably start with the '''Five W's'''. A good report is supposed to answer five basic questions: '''What''' happened? '''Where''' and '''when''' did it happen? '''Who''' did it or was involved? And '''why''' did it all happen?
 
Any course of journalism would probably start with the '''Five W's'''. A good report is supposed to answer five basic questions: '''What''' happened? '''Where''' and '''when''' did it happen? '''Who''' did it or was involved? And '''why''' did it all happen?
  
The first are fairly obvious, although you perspective would certainly affect, to a greater or lesser extent, the way you describe '''what''' happened.
+
The first three are fairly obvious, although your perspective would certainly affect, to a greater or lesser extent, the way you describe '''what''' happened. That's why Indymedia does not attempt to take an 'objective' and 'impartial' standpoint, the way mainstream media do to conceal their biases and alignments towards capitalism's power structures.
  
 
==Action Reports==
 
==Action Reports==

Revision as of 21:47, 8 April 2007

 Note: These notes are the personal views of the author(s) and reflect their personal experience with Indymedia. 
 Different people may have different opinions!

Any course of journalism would probably start with the Five W's. A good report is supposed to answer five basic questions: What happened? Where and when did it happen? Who did it or was involved? And why did it all happen?

The first three are fairly obvious, although your perspective would certainly affect, to a greater or lesser extent, the way you describe what happened. That's why Indymedia does not attempt to take an 'objective' and 'impartial' standpoint, the way mainstream media do to conceal their biases and alignments towards capitalism's power structures.

Action Reports

Photo Reports

Features

Useful Tips